September 24, 2012
Let Ryan be Ryan
The NY Times suggests that some of the ultra-right conservatives believe that Romney is not allowing "Ryan to be Ryan." No kidding! The reason is pretty obvious. Romney still wants to win. Ryan would rather lose this race to position himself for 2016.
It seems that none of the Republicans Romney defeated for the GOP Nomination are supporting Romney. He is not an easy guy to like, but in the past the runners-up would at least praise the nominee. Not this year; not this Romney.
October 3 is coming fast. Romney says he must win the debates. I have bad news for Mitt: Seldom does any front-runner lose a debate with soft-balls coming at them from corporate media.
I think we should have 10 debates without interference from a panel.
post a letter about this blog »
I wonder if Mitt the Twit already seems himself as POTUS and nothing else matters. He's on a divine mission. Go, ask Joseph Smith.
-Pietr Haikuu | Hurley, Wis | September 24, 2012
We might add that the debates include ALL candidates and not just the Democrat and Republican't subsets of the single corporate party running the show.
-Franz Fripplfrappl | Madison | September 24, 2012
A caller to WPR this morning's political hour asked Ken Rouden why Romney picked Ryan.
My opinion is he picked Ryan to placate the TeaParty Loonies.
Two days after Ann Coulter suggested the TeaParty just not vote in November unless Romney showed that he really was conservative, he choose Ryan.
-Rocky | Little Chicago, WI | September 24, 2012
The Tea Party not voting come November? What a terrible idea!
-Peter Felknor | Deerfield, WI | September 25, 2012
current
--------
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003