December 23, 2006
What I meant to say
During the Attorney General's race, J.B. Van Hollen railed against Peg Lautenslager for bringing "frivilous law suits like one against a cranberry farmer who is allegedly polluting a lake." As you know, it turns out Van Hollen's law firm was represnting that polluting farmer. "Oops!" said Van Hollen, "I didn't know my firm was involved." Yah, sure Ole.
Did your firm know? Did they warn you? Of all the things you could say against Peg, and you and WMC said a lot, how did this case come to your attention? The DOJ has hundreds of cases. Why this one?
Now, his new deputy says, Van Hollen won't get involved in matters being handled by his former firm. Is it really his former firm? The managing partner of the firm admits they discused his probable race for AG in the Spring of 2005 so they limited him to "cases that [would not] involve the DOJ or that could go to the DOJ." And, I'm not making this up, "mostly divorce cases and criminal defense matters."
The primary was in September of 2006 and Van Hollen was in a tough battle with Paul Bucher. Van Hollen is making himself unavailable to the media, presumably so he won't have to answer tough questions. Here are a few: A) How much were you paid to handle divorce and criminal defense cases between Spring of 2005 and the primary? B) Did your compensation change after you beat Bucher? C) You say you won't be involved in matters handled by your former firm. How will you know and who will do the checking for conflicts? D) Any chance you could put this in writing?
Ah, "what tangled webs we weave..."
post a letter about this blog »
current
--------
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003