September 23, 2012
Why we're in the ditch
By Bill Kraus
The rocky road to political civility has many detours, potholes, and even switchbacks. It may end up being inaccessible. But the voters, who told us that they disliked no fault recalls more than they disliked the governor, may find an unexpected, creative route to civility as well.
The first obstacle is deafness. The Supreme Court which opened the floodgates to third-party campaigners and their money have not noticed the collateral damage to the integrity of campaigns and campaigners and the unfairness of the playing field which their decisions have tilted toward unregulated, undisclosed attack advertising.
The second obstacle is incumbents whose lives are made miserable and expensive by the presence of those third parties and by the unfulfillable need to raise enough money to counter the damage done to them and their campaigns but not miserable enough for them to take advantage of the one remaining weapon they have to defend themselves: full disclosure of who these third parties are and where they get their money to do the awful things they do to the trade and its participants.
It was always this way, some say. It wasn’t. A good, gloves off, no holds barred, ad hominem battle for voters' attention and support is healthy, they say. It isn’t. In the first place it empties the talent pipeline by scaring off the people who political offices need in these complicated, difficult times. There is no second place.
The third obstacle is that as governing has become more complex we have become more sure of everything than we used to be of anything. Fewer and fewer of us are persuadable. More and more of us are looking for someone who will give us what we say we want.
The last obstacle is us or those of us who say we want more civility, more positive campaigns about ideas and solutions, fewer personal attacks, less spending. This is what we say. Those who are shaping the campaigns and the character assassinations don’t believe us.
They say demonization works.
They say that no attack can be left unanswered, that it must be countered with an equal and opposite attack.
They may be right.
What “they” point out is how few of us actually vote and how many of those of us who do are not all that interested in the vague virtues of civility and compromise our protestations to the contrary notwithstanding.
The proof “they” offer is the 18 percent turnout number. For a while I thought that 13 percent of the voters showed up in August to effectively elect a third of the state Legislature and to pick a candidate for the U.S. Senate. Horrifying. Actually the number was 18 percent. Less horrifying, but not much.
Either this proves that talk is cheap and that most voters want the campaigns they are getting, or that the voters who say they don’t want what they are getting are trapped in a world that doesn’t offer what they want.
Some of each.
Is there a turnout rabbit in that hat that produced an anti-recall vote? If so, I don’t know what it is. Until and unless turnouts double and voters are given a chance to vote for what they say they want, money and personal demonization are going to be the two most important criteria determining election strategies and tactics.
Anybody for a low-budget, big issue and idea based campaign that doesn’t feature an opponent's defects and missteps?
I didn’t think so.
post a letter about this blog »
I got a touch of whimsy reading this. I'm reminded of the legendary Dick Tuck (yes, that is a "T") who said upon losing his CA State Senate race, "The people have spoken, the bastards." Dick was quite the character. He argued for the rights of dead voters. In fact, during his race when he found out he was losing, he was heard to say, "Just wait till the dead vote comes in." Unfortunately, it didn't.
Richard Nixon was one of his favorite targets. During Nixon rallies, he would hire a very pregnant African American woman to wander around the rally wearing a tee shirt that said "Nixon's the One!"
He is also credited with waving a train out of the station while Nixon was on the back car still speaking to the crowd.
And after the first Kennedy-Nixon debate in 1960, Tuck hired an elderly woman who put on a Nixon button and embraced the candidate in front of TV cameras. She said, "Don't worry, son! He beat you last night, but you'll get him next time."
Yep. Legendary.
What about campaigns today?
Over the last couple of weeks, Romney has: 1) stated on his taxes that the US is a foreign country; 2) referred to the US as a corporation in a speech; and 3) wore a fake tan to a Univision interview whose primary audience is Hispanic. Stephen Colbert, Jon Stewart, and SNL ** will never have to worry about job security as long as our system keeps turning out the current calibre of candidates. Obama's just as bad, but Romney would be much worse as president.
Approximately 50% of the voters don't vote. Why? Well, it's hard to get excited about the candidates when they're basically the same. People will turn out if they're inspired.
Going to the moon? Yes, that's inspiring. Tax cuts for the overly rich? Not so much.
I think people might be smarter than we give them credit for.
** SNL
http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/09/snl-mocks-romney-fox-news-in-special-election-edition-spoof.php?ref=fpnewsfeed
** Colbert
http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/419254/september-19-2012/mitt-romney-s---barack-obama-s-secret-videos
-Mad Hemingway | Heart of Badger country | September 23, 2012
Long ago I remember hearing the suggestion that election day should be a paid holiday. It is, but only for the wealthy, for they truly are rewarded for their votes.
-Richard Kanak | Cherry Valley, IL | September 24, 2012
current
--------
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004