| |

August 30, 2012
The people vs. frac
By David Giffey
Grassroots organizing at its best is unfolding in unzoned Hixton Township in Wisconsin’s Jackson County, where residents are pushing a six-month moratorium on frac sand mining in order to provide time to “try to put in the best ordinance possible to regulate any mines that did get started.”
The town board scheduled a public hearing on the moratorium for Thursday, September 6, after 35 people showed up at a board meeting on the issue earlier in August.
Moratorium organizer Gaylord Oppegard said, “Thirty-five people at this township meeting is a large group. The [town board] chair said it would represent nearly one-third of the number of people who would normally vote.”
The Town of Hixton effort is a case study for rural Wisconsin people in townships that are targets for huge corporate mining interests because of the presence of ancient silica sand desired for use in the hydraulic fracturing process around the U.S. to tap gas and oil deposits. (See "Sand, oil, soil and cash" by Bill Berry on this website.)
Oppegard is certainly qualified to speak about frac sand mining.
“A speculator stopped and offered to buy 40 acres of our land adjacent to where he claims he has an option to buy other land for a sand mine,” Oppegard said. “For that reason alone, you can see my concern.” Another mine is proposed “just over the hill in the other direction,” he said.
The sand mining rush is a recent phenomena in west central Wisconsin and wherever silica sand mining operations and processing plants are consuming large tracts of Wisconsin, changing forever the state’s topography and posing serious water, air, and infrastructure pollution. Small townships like Hixton, without intervention from concerned citizens, will be victimized by unrestricted mining companies.
The corporations are seeking Wisconsin sand to be processed, trucked to railways, and shipped to other states where it is mixed with unnamed chemicals and pumped into underground bedrock to release the fossil fuels.
“There is no doubt that everything has happened…so quickly that it is difficult to keep track of it all,” said Oppegard, a retired teacher. “Our county board has lots of folks on it who would be OK with sand mines…as long as they are not located too close to them.” An often-repeated promise of jobs is also misleading.
Oppegard said he began knocking on neighbors' doors in July, and 25 people gathered in his house to decide to approach the town board. After getting on the Hixton board agenda, only one pro-miner showed up. That person “swore and left the room,” Oppegard recalled. The hearing was set and the board will vote on the moratorium at a meeting on September 10.
Hope prevails that the board will call a moratorium and strict mining regulations will follow. But the temptation of quick cash for landowners also prevails. One of the three town board supervisors “has a deal made to build a wash plant on his property if sand mines get started,” said Oppegard.
Praise is due to the people of the Town of Hixton for their vigilance in seeking a moratorium on sand mining. That’s a course of action that the state legislature and governor should follow as well. A statewide moratorium would provide much-needed aid to tiny municipalities already struggling to provide needed services like roads and snowplows, and additionally burdened trying to deal with greedy and powerful mining interests driven by profit, with track records of environmental plunder and mayhem.
Fighting Bob Fest on September 15 at the Alliant Center, Madison, will include a breakout session on open pit strip mining. The discussion will be open to all, and led by panelists Bob Kincaid, Al Gedicks, Frank Koehn, and Mike Wiggins, Jr., chairman of the Bad River Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians.
post a letter about this blog »
|
|
 "Is this a private fight, or can anyone join?"
-Old Irish saying
current
--------
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
|