May 27, 2012
Popular ideas that go nowhere
By Bill Kraus
This list of ideas does not include anything that has to do with limiting the flow of money into political campaigns or the unpopular things (endless campaigns, 30 second messages, robo calls, etc) that are purchased with that money. The U.S. Supreme Court has consistently ruled that money is a form of speech and is protected by the 1st Amendment to the Constitution no matter how unpopular the speech may be.
Information about the sources of free speech/money is, surprisingly, almost encouraged by the same Supreme Court. Don’t ask me to explain this mild anomaly. I can’t and they don’t.
This kind of disclosure is widely applauded. It is even legislated in the case of donations to candidates themselves. Proposals to go beyond that, however, founder. The only logical explanation for this (and, be forewarned, the regulation of campaign spending is not an area where logic prevails or even exists) is that the organizations that are collecting this outside money have convinced the people who have the power to expose the contributors of this outside money that their contributors do not want anyone to know who they are, and will, what’s more, stop contributing if exposure is mandated. These incumbents have done the math and concluded that it is more important to have this money in the game even though they have no guarantee that it will be spent disproportionately on their behalf. I think their math is questionable. They don’t. They have the power to quash full disclosure legislation. I don’t.
Since few if any candidates make an issue of this while campaigning and there is no public outcry for disclosure, it will not happen until it’s popularity rises to the level, say, of carrying concealed weapons.
Another subject that, when discussed, is viewed favorably, is the possibility that any candidates voters favor should have a chance to be elected. Given our propensity to cluster, there are inevitably going to be areas where Democrats or Republicans have no real chance of winning office. But should this be so in more than 80 percent of the state legislative districts and 100 percent of the congressional ones? I would think not. Is any candidate under any pressure from any significant numbers of constituents to even talk about this subject? Not that I can see. Even those of us who, thanks to Fighting Bob La Follette‘s open primary fixation, have to vote in the other party’s primary to get a modest say so about who will represent us in the state Legislature, are finding that our congressional representatives have been selected for us as well. This cannot be fixed everywhere, but until and unless there is an outburst of support for dispassionate districting then the gerrymandering of competition out of the general elections held in November will get worse not better.
These two popular but low-on-the-totem-pole ideas have the possibility of being enacted if talk turned to action. The incumbents and legislative leaders who are protecting an unpopular status quo could not hold onto it if voter discontent moved from talk to action. So act already.
There is a rising demand for more civility, more cooperation, more compromise in our legislatures. The prospect of this happening is derailed by the concomitant rise and popularity of smash mouth political campaigns. I admit to being confused. Surely I am not the only one who thinks that campaigns that demean the participants are mostly destructive of both the demeaned and the demeaning and the honorable and essential trade of politics itself.
The hyper partisans have always favored the politics of personality and attack. The virus is spreading. Otherwise reasonable voters can be heard praising their favorites for more aggressive criticisms of their opponents at a personal ad hominem level.
Aren’t these the same people who want more civility, cooperation, and who do not consider compromise a sign of weakness?
Are we condemned to mutual self destruction or do we really still want a government that works more than we want issues that inflame and torch bearing candidates?
Is it time to depose the reigning wisdom that the voters want candidates who dismantle their opponents and their opponents' forebears, values, and ideas before we are subsumed by the politics of hate?
How about doing a hatchet job on the problems that assail us instead of on each other?
Paranoid incumbents are afraid disclosure will offend their contributors. Powerful leaders won’t give up their power to gerrymander. But we can starve the belligerent campaign beasts by denying them the money and votes they need.
Talk is cheap, my mother used to say. She was right. It still is.
post a letter about this blog »
Since money is now free speech, may I now give the cop a $20 bill to explain why I wasn't speeding?
-Maria Caliente | Middleton, Wisconsin | May 27, 2012
current
--------
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004