June 26, 2011
Sticking with your own kind
By Bill Kraus
In his new book David Brooks comments on the state of politics thusly:
“Once politics became a contest pitting one identity group against another, it was no longer possible to compromise. Everything became a status war between my kind of people and your kind of people. Even a small concession came to seem like moral capitulation.
“Politics was no longer about trade, it was a contest for honor and group supremacy. Amidst this partisan ugliness, public trust in government and political institutions collapsed.”
This puts him in the group I described recently as the people who feel the same way about the loss of good feeling and the dismissal of compromise and anyone who seeks to practice it.
Neither Brooks nor any of the lamenters I have heard from have gone beyond the diagnosis to the remedy.
Those of us who look wistfully at the “good old days” are regarded as relics. I concede the point that the good old days were perhaps more old than good, but I still think they were better than what has evolved in our seriously polarized world.
The reform organizations offer up a long series of proposals that would give politics back to the politicians and begin to dismantle the beholdenism that is a feature of this era of non-stop, money driven campaigning. These go mostly nowhere and are mostly evidence that the reformers are playing with white chips in a blue chip game.
The rebellious newcomers in general, those who spring from or identify with the so called tea party movement prove to be less rebellious than expected and more narrowly focused. The tea party, it would appear, is not so much anti-establishment as it is anti-tax and anti-regulation.
The legislative leaders who continue to rule without serious opposition in their caucus-driven system are all powerful. They have tamed the newcomers and continue to brush off everyone who disagrees with them or their tactics. If you are not on their team, you may as well go home and play golf. You do not count. They are not a route to reform or compromise or civility or any of the other behavior that was a part of the government-that-works construct that the dominant moderates from both sides of the aisle created and protected for my long life in and around politics.
My suspicion is that the people who are complaining loudest about polarization are really more unhappy about being in the minority than they are about the lack of compromise. What they want is the power to be uncompromising themselves. I would be pleased to be proved wrong about this.
One de-polarizing proposal that has surfaced is the creation of a third party for those of us who still believe that the government has a legitimate role to play in our society, even though we may not be in total agreement on the size and extent of that role.
What this risks, of course, is the kind of dysfunction on view in other places in the world, where a small minority third party is really the majority party because neither of the larger parties can muster a majority without it.
My own proposal is more personal, less grandiose. It starts with talking to instead of screaming at each other.
For the longer term the solution, as always, lies with the people. We get the government we deserve, because we are the ones who choose our representatives. Votes count. Elections count. Choose well. It’s important.
post a letter about this blog »
Sit down with a mixed bag of friends sometime to watch Monday night football... Take the Pack vs the Bears, for example. Everyone picks sides and it's us against them all the way, even to the beers we drink. Whichever team wins, never lets the losers forget.
When did we become such a divided, competitive, all-or-none kind of people? Sometimes wonder if our fanaticism with professional sports hasn't turned us into what we are today. Add the talking heads of ESPN or Fox, the opinions, the theories, etc, and it seems there is no way out.
This nation of ours responds to just about every situation with either menacing rhetoric or military might. The purveyors of fear motivate the thoughtless masses to go for the jugular instead of using reason and tact to settle differences. The more we seem to move forward, the more backwards we have really become.
We have no politicians anymore, only bullies who may claim to listen but predictably fail to hear.
-Maria Caliente | Middleton, Wisc | June 26, 2011
Once again, Bill, I think you're a little late with the handwringing and the plea "Can't we all just get along?"
Mark me down as one who has little appetite for compromise (or David Brooks, for that matter!) when I am under assault in this ongoing class war launched against me and my friends and neighbors. How silly it is to now plea for a reasoned response after Walker and the Kochs and ALEC and their cowardly appeasers (Yes, I'm talking about YOU, Repub Legislators who know better!) have ratcheted up the attacks and the over-the-top giveaways to the wealthy and the corporate clients.
Class War ain't for the faint of heart. But looking around at the actions of your Republican colleagues, I'd dare say it's all we've got. Count me in!
-Jeff Pieterick | Waterloo, WI | June 26, 2011
current
--------
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004