February 14, 2011
Illinois redux
By Bill Kraus
Not too many years ago there was a Supreme Court election in Illinois which attracted the participation of two outside groups.
One of the group’s agenda was to cap, contain, control, reduce the amount that could be awarded in personal injury cases. The other group was presumably composed of lawyers who represented the plaintiffs in personal injury cases and did not like capping, containing, controlling, or reducing the amounts granted by juries to their clients.
The lack of disclosure being what it is there was no way to be sure who belonged or contributed to these two groups. A problem. Actually, a correctible problem which is not being corrected in Wisconsin for sure and elsewhere probably.
By the time this Illinois election was over some $13 million had been spent on ads for and against the candidates involved.
Most of it came from the aforementioned “groups.”
The advertising was entirely focused on an issue which was totally irrelevant to the goals of the two groups who were so heavily involved. The issue in their ads had to do with which of the two contenders was tougher on crime.
The money spent on ads by the candidates themselves did not deal with this issue, but whatever the candidates had to say about the reasons for people to vote them was overwhelmed by the spending on the minor subject [as far as the Illinois and most state supreme courts for that matter are concerned] of crime.
There is a possibility that the current race for Justice Prosser’s seat on the Wisconsin Supreme Court could draw this kind of attention as well.
An organization called the Wisconsin Civil Justice Council is running ads extolling the virtues of Justice Prosser already. This organization, whose members and money sources are of course unknown, falls into the “cap, contain, control, reduce” category mentioned previously.
There are several organizations who do not agree with the Wisconsin Civil Justice Council. They have been silent so far. The reason is that they do not know if Justice Prosser will survive the primary. If so, spending money against him would be foolish. They also don’t know who will oppose him if he does survive and whether that candidate is more likely to favor less or no capping, controlling, containing and, reducing jury awards. They do loom however.
This may be a false alarm, of course.
Don’t bet on it.
What you can bet on is that the ads for and against the candidates picked by these 3rd party organizations will not be about the items they are really concerned about.
The Wisconsin Civil Justice Council is already praising Justice Prosser for his stalwartness in opposition to crime. Is there anyone in the race who isn’t opposed to crime? Or to put it another way, they picked this issue for its emotional impact in hopes it would get them a winner who was sympathetic on their issue.
As, if, and when the people who represent the causes of injured plaintiffs weigh in to this campaign, you can be assured that they will be talking about toughness on crime as well.
And we will have Illinois redux?
At what cost? Thirteen million sounds ridiculous, but who would have suspected that a governor’s race in Wisconsin a once abstemious, fiscally conservative state would have attracted $37 million in contributions from partisans.
To sum up, if the campaign does come to this, you won’t know who is involved, but you can know what is.
You’re welcome.
post a letter about this blog »
current
--------
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004