December 25, 2010
Campaign reform magi
By Bill Kraus
Not under anyone’s Christmas tree, but a welcome gift to all of us is something called the impartial justice law. It came from the governor, the Legislature, a motley collection of reformers, and mostly from the current justices of the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
What the law does is provide enough public money to fully fund campaigns for the Supreme Court to candidates who agree to abide by the adequate but far from obscene spending limits mandated by the statute.
The desirable side effects are that taking advantage of the law’s provisions shields candidates for the court from the onerous business of fund raising which has the additional desirable side effect of simultaneously getting rid of any suspicion that the funders they no longer have to solicit may be buying something more with their contributions than a talented judiciary.
There have been enough questions raised in judicial elections around the country to cast a shadow over the objectivity of those elections, to raise doubts about the independence of judges elected with money raised from private sources.
Former U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor was alarmed enough by this trend to tour the country urging states that elect judges to change their laws so judges are appointed not elected.
When she was in Wisconsin this year making the case for an appointed judiciary she was surprised and pleased to learn about what the latter day magi mentioned earlier had wrought here.
The gift will be on display for the first time in the spring Supreme Court election. The several candidates who have announced their candidacy have said they will accept the public funding and abide by the spending limits.
This should result in lower profile, less-intrusive campaigning which focuses on the character and credentials of the contenders not on a result that large contributors are seeking.
The larger question that may be answered next winter and spring is whether this campaign will be so salutary that the model will be extended by popular demand into the partisan, ideologue-ridden, nasty elections scheduled for the fall of 2012.
The great political sage and former member of the Assembly and head of the state’s Department of Public Instruction, Bert Grover, has been telling us all along that nothing will happen to the way we run elections until “we get Mathilda on the dance floor.”
When we see what kind of elections the impartial justice model (Mathilda) produces, and if we like what we see, we will have a model to follow and adopt to replace what went on in 2010. Most voters and observers characterized what went on this year as too expensive, too long, too negative, somewhere between disgusting and hateful. Mathilda, if she can dance the way we hope and expect, can show us some steps to learn and follow that will produce a more civilized election process.
post a letter about this blog »
This is not a regular letter just some questions.
I would hope the impartial justice bill will work. However, won't Prosser still not sign the agreement and spend millions just like Gableman? The only difference here would be that the other candidates would have some money. (How much would that be?)
There are also the outside groups and won't they still spend millions? Is there anything in the law that limits that?
-Kathleen Hart | Muskego, WI | December 27, 2010
current
--------
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004