May 6, 2012
What all that money buys
By Bill Kraus
In light of the recent and predicted excessive spending on politics it is easy to focus on and complain about how much is being spent and on what. There are some undesirable side effects of this extravagance, though, that don’t get sufficient attention.
Some are obvious.
This embarrassment of political riches suborns:
Beholdenism. Is there anyone who doesn’t think multi-digit donations are buying something? Access for sure. Ego food as well. It is surprising how many with money think that power is more important and will lavish their wealth on anyone who will put them into proximity to power. The money is not necessarily buying something untoward, but it could be, and it is, for sure, buying something.
Paranoia. There is a widespread belief by candidates and incumbents that money is the direct, and maybe the only route to power. This belief is both fostered and exploited by the economic beneficiaries of the unseemly spending on political advertising: the professional campaigners who are being paid to spend the money and the media, mostly television stations, that fill the airwaves with the commercials the professionals have produced.
Causes and interests. The independent spending is largely pro- or anti-something. Guns. Jury awards. Beliefs. It is also pro- or anti-candidates who share those beliefs. What gets less or no attention is the more general interest on which little spending is lavished and the governing issues and ideas which draw little interest and even less money.
Participation. The press, which likes things like polls and numbers, makes us think that they think winning the money race is as important as winning the vote race. At least their coverage of the money race would indicate that’s what they believe. The reason one otherwise worthy gubernatorial candidate’s prospects of winning office are dismissed is for lack of money. The reason another otherwise well qualified and substantial gubernatorial candidate’s campaign never left the starting blocks is ditto.
Imagination. Money is not attracted to new ideas or to candidates who might bring something creative to the offices being sought. A lot of money goes to make sure the status quo stays intact.
Ideology. Money is heavily committed to ideology. Since money is intended to elect candidates similarly inclined, we tend to end up with legislatures and executive offices dominated by ideologues. The problem with that, as we are reminded every day, is that ideologues are not good at governing. They are not interested in abstractions like compromise and considering whether others with different views about anything or everything may have the benefit of seeing those things differently because they have a different perspective. Ideologues indulge in gridlock. Governing must be gridlock proof.
Stupidity. The recall fever which started last year and is will reach new heights soon is all the proof one needs about the fact that money is important (like those who have it) without being very smart. The first wave of recall elections showed that there comes a point when those with too much money don’t have enough worthwhile ways to spend it. I count misspending or overspending as stupid. My nomination for winning in the most stupid category is the finals of the gubernatorial recall. What we don’t know is how many will turn out for a June election or how many of those people who signed recall petitions are eligible to vote or are going to do so. What we do know is that almost all of the people being polled who say they are going to vote have already decided for whom. So millions of dollars are going to be spent on advertising to influence people who are not susceptible to being influenced. That is really stupid.
post a letter about this blog »
current
--------
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004