March 18, 2012
Desparately seeking solutions
By Bill Kraus
Facing the prospect of telling a class of college students about the state of electoral politics focuses the mind.
Everyone has a long list of the things that have gone wrong.
Everyone also has fingers to point in multiple directions at a long list of culprits who are responsible for the current state of dysfunction.
The students themselves know that the three 'P's--Polarization, Partisanship, even Populism--are wreaking havoc with the representative government we all think the founding fathers envisioned. That the system is broken.
What they expect to hear is how to fix it. I have a simple answer for them: I don’t know how.
There are many fixes to pick from and they cover the spectrum from the free market/libertarian right to the full public funding/fully regulated left.
There is no consensus. The people don’t agree. The parties don’t agree. The courts don’t agree. And above all the incumbents who we are taught to look to for solutions to public problems really don’t agree.
I take that back. Given the state of inaction and inattention by these same incumbents it is possible to conclude that most of them either don’t think there is a problem with the political processes or don’t think the problem is consequential enough to deserve a high place on their priority lists.
The reason we are immobilized then is the classic one of everyone agreeing that there is a problem until a solution is proposed at which time the solution becomes the problem.
Daniel Yankelovich (yes, that Daniel Yankelovich) told an audience in California recently that Americans have always had a strong practical streak that took over whenever the country faced a large, insurmountable problem. He expects it to kick in again. It hasn’t yet.
Wisconsin’s Bill Kellett used to tell us to keep our eye on the squirrel. The squirrel is political dysfunction. Until that is fixed, we can’t even get to the other squirrels.
These are/were optimistic people driven by old-time pragmatism, which is missing, and focus, which is as well.
It is time, to use Lincoln’s phrase, to think anew.
The students may not get what they came to class for. I am hoping I will get what I am coming to class for: new thinking, new ideas, heightened concerns. Even a route to a workable representative government for this incredibly diverse--and still creative--country?
post a letter about this blog »
current
--------
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004